January 17, 2004

This post is original material . . . I promise

I will draw attention to an interesting debate at slashdot where a student successfully defended his rights against his university not to submit his class papers to a automated plagiarism checker.

Although much of the discussion is about cheating, one interesting notion is the right to profit off one's own work within a university/college setting. This auto-checker (independent of the university) profits off his work by using it to check later papers, and thus increasing its effectiveness and marketability to other colleges and institutions. The student thus loses his intellectual property. I find it most interesting as a digital property rights discussion. Moreover, it raises questions about the American principle of "innocent until proven guilty" within institutional settings.

Posted by Jake at January 17, 2004 12:16 PM | TrackBack
Comments

An interesting issue indeed. One thing that confuses me, though. Explain to me how it is possible for the student to "lose his intellectual property?" What do you mean by "Intellectual property," and how, if at all, does it differ from physical property?

Posted by: gauche at January 17, 2004 01:29 PM

Forgive my imprudent semantics. Your question hits right at the heart of the issue.

Posted by: Jake at January 17, 2004 02:29 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?